Archived page

    “Even after a judge required ACS to reunite Ms. Rivers with her baby, ACS continued to subject Ms. Rivers to needless court proceedings and a litany of conditions that interfered with her parenting of TW for months, while the unlawful removal of her baby was ratified by senior ACS leadership,” the complaint reads. “This was not because ACS was trying to protect TW; this was because Ms. Rivers is Black.”

  • AngryHumanoid
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    The article said a nurse witnessed the mother smoking pot in the hospital room, I would err on the side of assuming that was the reason the baby was tested. The article says there is a history of racism at CPS in NY towards black people which yeah, that’s an issue. But I’m unwilling to assume that about hospital workers given that the inherent basis of medical work is to treat everyone as best you can regardless of personal feelings.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The article said a nurse witnessed the mother smoking pot in the hospital room, I would err on the side of assuming that was the reason the baby was tested.

      Agreed — I can’t even muster any doubt that that’s why.

      Seems a fairly obvious conclusion that she smoked pot in her hospital room, which led someone to order a marijuana test on both mother and child. That test led to the child being taken away.

      A quick Googling suggests that the penalty for smoking indoors in New York is a fine of up to $2,000. Seems harsh, but we don’t want people smoking indoors, so levy the fine.

      It doesn’t say that the penalty is losing your child.

      • AngryHumanoid
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah but you’re thinking of it as an action being punished. She was not reported to the police for doing something illegal, even though they technically could have. The hospital was not trying to punish her, they were trying to make sure the child was safe. CPS didn’t take the child away because the mother smokes pot (see caveat at the end), they took the child away because the mother smoked while pregnant. Not to punish her, to protect the baby.

        Caveat: a major point of the article is that CPS had been continuing to use smoking pot as a factor of determining unsafe conditions, which they should not have been doing once pot was made legal. Just like smoking cigarettes is not illegal and shouldn’t be a factor in and of itself. However, smoking cigarettes or pot AROUND children is still a negative factor.

        • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t see any of what happened happening if she hadn’t smoked marijuana in her hospital room, so I can’t envision how what happened isn’t punishment for that act.

          You’re saying they took the child away because the mother smoked while pregnant. I’d like to know how common that is. Are newborns taken away if staff is aware any mother smokes pot while pregnant?

          Did health care workers remain mandated to report marijuana use after is became legal?

          • AngryHumanoid
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Obviously there could be mountains of context we don’t have which could push this in either direction. I do know subjecting children to second hand smoke is absolutely a factor which can result in CPS getting involved.

            Tovthecbwsr of my knowledge hospital workers have never been mandated to report drug usage to the police, I know for a fact it’s explicitly illegal for medical staff to report drug use to the police, with one major exception: if there is evidence of harm to the user.

            As for reporting drug use to CPS: probably depending on the drug. Again, pot use is legal, but if you get high around your children to the point where you are diminished in your ability to care for that child it becomes an issue.

            • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              You must be a teacher — you’re good at this. Your third paragraph is an eye-opener, and makes all this make somewhat more sense to me. Someone who’s toking in a hospital bed might be someone who tends to toke to excess.

              Even second-hand smoke — my instant response is to say that’s nuts, because I’m old and grew up with kids who must’ve had black lung by junior high school, just from their parents’ second hand smoke. But it’s a different era, and there’s no doubt that it’s harmful to kids.

              • AngryHumanoid
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Heh, not a teacher, I’ve just been in a career for a long time that primarily requires explaining data to people. I spent enough years as a data analyst to know how bad policing in the US is, the numbers are pretty damn clear. It definitely sounds like NY CPS has its issues but I’ve seen a lot of data around what other state CPS organizations do and they get a lot of crap to do an insanely difficult job.