Oil is out, batteries are out.

We need smarter solutions that work with the environment, not exploit it.

Watch the video and tell me you didn’t say ‘… holy fuck.’

  • dillekant@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Added to my reading list.

    The final comment was sarcasm but probably encompassing more than it should. See, UE is a nominally right wing channel (there’s grey areas, I’m not trying to dismiss him, but it’s important to see where he’s coming from). His aim is somewhat to convince you to do nothing: You won’t achieve global equality from electric vehicles, so why try? The unsaid bit is as though you could do this via fossil fuels.

    This is what conservatives believe btw: We have infinite fossil fuel, stay on the current path and give access to the global south to that infinite fuel, and everyone prospers. You could create an equal but opposite response video where the global south gets access to that fossil fuel, and then see how long we go before we run out (it’s within Greta Thunberg’s lifetime) and how much it would cost (a lot, given conservatives are already pissed at the costs currently). DUN DUN DUNNNNN and then (unsaid) EVs look a lot more appetising.

    So anyway, because conservatives gonna conservative, they’d obviously immediately pivot to “who cares about the global south this is why we have the nukes lol” because often they do not critically analyse their beliefs. So my comment was compressing all of that ^^ into “we can use EVs who cares about the global south lol”.

    • laser@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha, great response, I somehow knew that you were exactly on that line of thought. Preach