• cmysmiaczxotoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wayland if you have more that one monitor. X11 can support multiple monitors but it is a disaster.

    Rustdesk doesn’t work on Wayland and that is a real bummer

    • bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      I run a dual monitor on X11 and never understood why people have issues with it? I’m by no means a Linux expert and I do run in Nvidia, I run different refresh rates. Can someone explain it to me?

        • ngoomie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even without considering laptops, I can already imagine quite a few circumstances where someone might want monitors of differing DPIs. I’ve actually thought sometimes of getting a smaller monitor I can have off to the side that I display a browser window containing mostly text on when I’m playing videogames or working in something like Blender or Aseprite; yknow, for referencing a guide, wiki, or manual or something. I don’t even have a super high desire for a multi-monitor setup outside of that.

        • hypertown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I run 2 monitors with different DPIs and X11 works without an issue. Can’t say the same about wayland where scaling still has so many bugs it’s just unusable.

          • You can’t set 2 different DPIs for the monitors on X11. On one monitor everything is just going to be bigger than the other. Depending on the DPI difference it can be basically unusable.

            • hypertown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Valid point. I forgot about 4K… I run just 125% scale so it doesn’t bother me at all. Well it’s kinda funny that both protocols are broken in that regard.

              • Gamey@feddit.rocks
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I feel like taht’s often the case but Wayland as the newer protocol usually has the correct architecture with a early implementation while X11 has hard to fix architectural problems. I am a opponend of “whatever works for you” and I think that will be Wayland for most people fairly soon if it isn’t already but in case it actually isn’t I wouldn’t recommend it because, well, it doesn’t work properly for you.

            • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              You can configure software rescaling using xrandr and some scripts… But that can cause a massive amount of jank with anything that requires a degree of pixel accuracy

      • cmysmiaczxotoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        x11

        2 monitors 144hz, 1 TV 120hz.

        Nothing on any monitor can render at higher than 120hz

        Play movie on any one screen, other screens can’t render anything at higher than 24fps

        Wayland works fine

      • Freeman@lemmy.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I do similar. For laptops and docks, especially if they change setups it can be a pita (though you just need to copy files around).

        Also the DE monitor config (ie that you use to login) is logically different to a users x config. So you gotta copy that over to make sure the primary monitor etc is right.