I wanted to get a feel for everyone’s thoughts on desktop environments (or window managers if you don’t use a DE). I’m new to Lemmy, so apologies if this is too low-effort a post.

Personally I’m running KDE on my main computer, but I have an Arch virtual machine I use for more experimentation. That VM has seen KDE, i3, and will probably see hyprland at some point soon

  • RainRaining@lemmy.world
    6·
    1 year ago

    I use a window manager, Openbox. It’s great once you have your personal config file and shortcuts! Also, I can’t be sure but I think @mutoroglin@feddit.nl recently switched to Hyperland lol

  • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
    4·
    1 year ago

    I’m using xfce. It’s on endeavros as I like to belong to the arch crowd without working with the lengthly set up from scratch.

    I prefer xfce as anything of note is accessible with a few minor exceptions due to endeavros security concerns such as Bluetooth which requires a quick systemctl command.

    I started off with it after discovering ubuntu and trying the xfce version. I liked it and went through a few distros including crunchbang with openbox but ultimately xfce is a very straightforward experience for me and fairly customisable. The only drawback is it doesn’t look like some of the awesome screenshots I’ve seen of i3 or other tiling managers but as a teacher I don’t do development or have that much knowledge to tinker so xfce is my go-to.

    • ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world
      OP
      1·
      1 year ago

      That’s the setup I tried to get used to. I miiight still have it, although it was on my testing VM so I think I have reinstalled since then

  • CocoLopez@lemmy.world
    3·
    1 year ago

    Kde, let me change everything every time I get bored instead of switching to a whole different WM.

  • myxi@feddit.nl
    3·
    1 year ago

    I have Plasma installed on my Arch based installation, but I hardly use it since I also have i3 installed which I adore.

    My i3 setup looks very similar to my Plasma setup, I prefer window managers because they are more productive to use.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Gnome. It just seems simple, elegant and smooth. It does what I need from a DE (not that much, I do a lot in terminal and Emacs). It has good keybindings out of the box and good virtual desktop mechanisms. It was also the first DE with good Wayland support. At first I was unsure if I liked Gnome’s concept and restrictions, but I’ve grown to like it fast.

  • ghostwolf@lemmy.fakeplastictrees.ee
    2·
    1 year ago

    I’ve switched to LXQt recently. I like KDE and use mostly Qt apps, but KDE itself has too many features I don’t really need. So far so good, I can’t say I miss anything.

  • laskobar@discuss.tchncs.de
    2·
    1 year ago

    I’m switching between Arch and Manjaro, but I’m using mostly Gnome. Recently I had some weeks with KDE, but since Evolution is not well integrated, I’m using Gnome now again. Kmail is uncomfortable and total illogical for me. I don’t get it to work the way I need it. Maybe the redesigned Thunderbird changes my mind, but there was a lot illogical other workflows on KDE on top. So I think I stay with Gnome or switch to XFCE.

  • boomboxnation@lemmy.ca
    2·
    1 year ago

    Sway. I look around every few months but nothing usually, um, erm pendulates my interest. I have hyprland installed…but my config file breaks with every update, and it’s rice first, function later. I’m an opposite-ricer. I like to strip all decorations.

      • boomboxnation@lemmy.ca
        1·
        11 months ago

        Just keep the config file(s) handy and always be playing with them. Join IRC #sway@Libera. Oh…and you can use the majority of the i3wm docs outside of anything doing with output or input. While I love man pages…I prefer web content for my docs.