As he pulled his luggage through downtown New Haven, Conn., a woman handed him a flier describing his new city as crime-ridden and dangerous. It listed alarming local crime statistics and instructed students to “remain on campus,” “avoid public transportation” and “stay off the streets after 8 p.m.” Illustrated with a picture of the Grim Reaper, the flier wished students an ominous “Good luck.”

But perhaps most jarring was the source of the flier, listed plainly in its text: the union that represents Yale’s own campus police.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/25/nyregion/yale-police-fliers.html

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        So if you think someone has a little more money than you do, it’s OK to rob them for no other reason than you would like more money? Again, this is bad, and not leftism, despite the class-based veneer you’re throwing on it.

        Moving from “some crimes are justified, or even good, because they further a leftist project that benefits working people” to “crime is rad lol” creates this type of opportunism.

        • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          a little more money than you do

          lol

          they have a lot more money than i do

          it’s OK to rob them for no other reason than you would like more money

          that more money would mean i don’t have to choose between power and food, so yeah

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            “crime is rad lol”

            Yep this is about it

            In response to your edit about power and food: assuming that’s true, robbing an individual stranger is maybe the least justifiable type of theft. An electronics store is what you’re looking for.

              • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                The only reason to prefer mugging a random student over walking out of Target with a TV is wanting to hurt a person, or at least screw them over individually.

                You just want to punch up, which is understandable. But it’s not leftism, and it doesn’t justify victimizing a person instead of a company.

                • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The only reason to prefer mugging a random student over walking out of Target with a TV is wanting to hurt a person

                  we don’t have target here
                  way less likely to get caught mugging some rando
                  you don’t really need to hurt them
                  again, never said it’s leftism

                  you also need to flog the tv
                  and get it home

                • 🔻Sleepless One🔻@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The only reason to prefer mugging a random student over walking out of Target with a TV is wanting to hurt a person, or at least screw them over individually.

                  stalin chad yes balloon

                  • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Stalin robbed banks, not individuals, and he was doing it to fund a proletarian party, not for his personal benefit.

                    Few people want to associate with a political movement that encourages or allows casual violence. Those movements are disconnected from the people and open season for opportunists. It should not be a hot take to want violence to be carefully directed towards political ends.