• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    but you see, only one group can be vulnerable at a time, and this time it’s women, so trans people have to be the ones we exclude and accuse of being the oppressors this time around, sorry

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also Rowling’s argument is intrinsically conservative. “We fought hard for these rights. Giving these same rights to others erodes them”

      Its literally viewing treating people as equals as a zero sum game. It’s viewing liberty not as the freedom to live without interference from outside forces, but instead as existing in a privileged position over others

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        “zero sum game”

        A while back I realised how this component works in many (all?) conservative mindsets and it really changed how I understood the difference between me and people who are conservative — they really do feel that others can’t gain without someone else losing.