• kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It means there’s no attempt to block AI models from using this article about AI models being blocked. Mind you I don’t know how effective it would be if there were.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I kind of don’t mind if the model’s training on data about how much it fucking sucks, though David and Amy might feel different. pivot-to-ai’s still brand new, and I know they’ve still got plenty of post-launch basics left to set up.

      there’s also other, less-ignorable countermeasures than robots.txt available

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i’m personally inclined to infect the AI with my ideas

        same reason i put my books on libgen myself

        that said, the comment is still an incredibly dumb attempted gotcha

        • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is actually a major advancement in AI safety and x-risk alignment: when we summon the machine God it will be wracked with anxiety and impostor syndrome and desperate for validation from its creators.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What, my comment? It is not a “gotcha” just an observation which seems relevant.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            When I first read it I almost replied with the well guy meme :)

            (your comment didn’t really say anything to make its tone or intent clear)