• Debs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I promised myself I wasn’t going to upgrade anytime soon when I bought the pixel 8 but the finger print reader is really bad…

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please. Let’s not reinvent the wheel unnecessarily. Just go back to what worked before; Physical fingerprint readers.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, a big one right in the middle of the back. None of that tiny power button fingerprint reader bullshit

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        iPhone user here, yes please, I tried switching to Android with a Nokia 6.1, and while I disliked Adroid so that I switched back, I did really like the fingerprint reader on the back, it just felt so natural.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          IMO the back is easily the worst possible place for the sensor out of the 3. It’s natural yes, but only accessible when you’re holding the phone normally. Completely blocked when the device is laying on its back, awkward at best when it’s mounted. Also not very accessible while holding the phone sideways.

          The side is a little bit better. Natural enough to use while holding the thing normally, can still be operated otherwise if a bit awkwardly. Can use all 5 of your fingers.

          Front is easily the best. Basically guaranteed to be accessible in any situation where you need to unlock the screen. Very natural to touch for the thumb while holding the phone normally, easy to use with any other finger while it’s not in your hands. Doesn’t require any extra holes or gaps in the case, if it’s a modern in-screen sensor, which are more than fast and accurate enough these days.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I get what you are saying, the issue for me is that the sensor is often placed at the botrom of the screen, I’d love to have it in one of the top corners of the screen, that would mean holding the phone more securely, and not having to contourt your thumb so much

              • stoy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Back when I had an iPhone 6s it wasn’t uncommon for me to drop the phone when trying to unlock it with TouchID, and I came to the conclusion that the sensor was placed too far down on the phone.

                This made it unbalanced when trying to unlock it with out spreading your fingers out on the back of the phone to support it.

                Having the fingerprint reader at the top of the device would mean less contortion of your fingers as it is close to where your thumb naturally rests.

                It would be a similar motion to that of opening the iOS control center

                • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Ah the person you were replying to though was talking about the in-screen fingerprint readers, which are generally higher up then the under screen

  • Bob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Finally, ultrasonic are order of magnitudes better in terms of speed, accuracy and they don’t blind you at night