starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square342fedilinkarrow-up11.16K
arrow-up11.16KimageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square342fedilink
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoLower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
minus-squareKazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-23 days agoI would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
minus-squareDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
To a certain point.