• iceonfire1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think law enforcement can break into your home if they have a court warrant, right? So why not allow the same thing with electronic communications?

    For me, the reason to disallow it is the potential for abuse. There were 864 search warrant applications across all federal agencies in 2022. In 2020, the FBI, specifically, issued 11504 warrants to Google, specifically, for geofencing data, specifically. Across all agencies there are probably millions of such “warrants” for data.

    It’s far easier to access your data than your house, so comparing physical and cybersecurity doesn’t really make sense.

    In general, criminals can easily just move to an uncompromised platform to do illegal stuff. But giving the govt easy access to messaging data allows for all kinds of dystopic suppression for regular people.

    • Marcy_Stella@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally tech companies now have agreements with law enforcement so they don’t have to deal with all the legal mumbo jumbo. Some data does still require a warrant such as if there is any protection laws(such as HIPAA protected data) or if the company considers it highly sensitive data but for a lot of data it’s easier to just hand it over then get legal involved.