• hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    By majority it’s 100%, physics exists and the time required to maneuver in being capable of turning or lane changing is plenty to clearly signal what it will do. The reality is that if you need turn signals you are bad at driving and should not drive. Most humans are not capable and cars should not be how the majority of people get around.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Well I thought the answer was to avoid crashes by signalling to people behind you that you’re about to turn.

              But you’re claiming that’s not the case.

              So why do cars have turn signals?

              I am not psychic, sorry.

              • hglman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                I’m saying that if you need signals to reduce the risk of crashing you shouldn’t drive, which is probably 98% of humans. That is the vast majority of people should drive.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Okay, well good luck convincing people not to go to work or the supermarket in places without robust public transportation unless they have a bicycle and it isn’t dangerously cold or dangerously hot outside.