• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Do you have some kind of pointer to a summary of what concrete impacts it actually has? Like, the article here doesn’t list any concrete material. I see some phrases like “20% of land and sea”. Given that Hungary and Austria were apparently both reluctant and both are land-locked, I am wondering if it was “20% of land and sea”, where sea can substitute for land.

    Does it basically ask EU members to designate at least 20% of their territory as a sort of national park?

    The EC has a section on their website on the thing, but it’s…really fluffy and full of marketing material. Their factsheet on the law is…very sparse on actual facts about the law.

    EDIT: This Wikipedia page seems to reference what is a superset of it:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Green_Deal

    But the targets there don’t seem to match up with what is going through, like:

    The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 includes the following targets:

    • Protect 30% of the sea territory and 30% of land territory especially primary forests and old-growth forests.

    …whereas the law that went through uses “20%”.

    EDIT: Okay, that’s definitely a superset of what was planned for the law, because the page does reference the targets that were actually taken being 20%.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      The factsheet is vague because it tells countries to find a way to fix a problem. All countries have to come up with a realistic method to improve natural areas, 20% by 2026, 30% need a concrete plan by 2030 and 90% by 2050.

      More importantly, there’s a requirement that Member States make a significant effort to prevent worsening in the meantime.

      What those plans are, is up to the Member States, but they need to be solid and realistic, not the usual vagueness