• Guntrigger@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 months ago

    the soldiers began a “suspect arrest procedure,” which included opening fire at one of the suspects

    Seems like a slightly harsh procedure to arrest someone with stones as their weapon.

    • Barns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      10 months ago

      Without opening a discussion about the conflict itself or justifying anything in the article, I will say that as someone who’s been on the receiving end of an adult throwing 5-10 pounds rocks at full strength at them, I truly think you’re underestimating the deadly damage it can cause.

      This isn’t a toddler throwing pebbles, such a rock hitting a human will break bones on contact and can absolutely kill of it hits someone’s head

      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, you have to view it like stoning. One good rock to an unprotected head is all it takes to turn the lights off.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Civilians walking around or driving in cars? No they don’t.

          Even for the army with gear on, it will generally save their lives when hit in the right spot, but the stones will still cause injuries wherever they hit.

      • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I know rocks CAN be deadly. But so can lots of things. From the info in the article they were throwing rocks at cars, not IDF forces who are undoubtedly armoured to the teeth for greater stopping power than rocks.

        Just seems strange to shoot someone for not obeying when they aren’t directly threatening you, but the article is a bit light on actual details. Being the source that it is, I don’t think they would hesitate to highlight the IDF were defending themselves if they actually were.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Using a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death is much worse than possessing a deadly weapon. You think people in cars haven’t died from stone throwers before?

          • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t understand this logic. IDF literally shooting someone is somehow less of a “use of a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death” than throwing a stone at a car?

            I get that they deemed the person dangerous, but shooting someone for throwing a stone is a slippery slope to all sorts of things, eg. Kettled protesters who start throwing stones at riot police. Should the police just mow them all down because rocks can be deadly?

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why do you keep using arguments where stones are being thrown at police/army? These stones were being thrown at unarmed, unprotected humans.

              • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Stop being disingenuous. The rocks were thrown at cars. They weren’t interrupting a public stoning.

                • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Do you know how many people died from rocks thrown at cars? I’m not talking hypotheticals, I’m talking real deaths and injuries.

                  • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Do you? I’d wager it’s considerably lower than deaths from shootings involving figures of authority.

    • PitzNR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      The actual procedure is actually calling the suspect to stop, first in Hebrew, then in Arabic, if the suspect does not stop then the soldier loads a round in the chamber, next a warning shot to the air, and then shooting at the suspect’s legs, all the while calling for the suspect to stop. IDF has a tendency to… Expedite this procedure.

      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It doesn’t help that the ultra-religious, which makes up 99% of settlers, hate the IDF almost as much as Palestinians. The fact they weren’t throwing rocks at the troops surprised me the most.

        • magnetosphere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t help that the ultra-religious, which makes up 99% of settlers, hate the IDF almost as much as Palestinians.

          I had no idea this was the case. Thanks!

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t help that the ultra-religious, which makes up 99% of settlers, hate the IDF almost as much as Palestinians.

          Wait really? Why?

          • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s a big mixed bag, but a few key reasons are:

            • The IDF represent an armed faction of the secular Jews of Israel. They will make a distinction of Israelis and Israelites, with the Orthodox being the latter. Before the Romans, there were the states of Israel (Tel Aviv) and Judea (Jerusalem), so that separation continues in their mind.
            • If their kids were conscripted, they fear the secular influences upon them and it is a driving factor in their opposition to conscription.
            • Surprisingly, there are factions of Orthodox who don’t believe the state of Israel should exist, at least until the Messiah returns. So they oppose the armed faction of the illegitimate state.

            There is so much I can’t even begin to explain, and I’m sure some Israelis would even have corrections from what I learned over there. The Orthodox live a decent lifestyle which is 100% paid for by the Secular community, so they can spend their days studying and causing trouble for others. When you hear about armed groups shooting at Palestinians and burning down homes, you’re making a safe bet if you assume they’re Orthodox.

            • Historical_General@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              90 percent of war crimes and abuses that I hear about tend to be idf related. Whenever I hear about settlers, it’s normally about them stealing a house or occupying.

              • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Then you’re not actually paying attention to what is happening. Just whatever headline pops up when you happen to be watching.

                The Orthodox community isn’t an army, so the crimes they commit would never be labeled as war crimes.

                  • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    They always have, and there is an Orthodox unit with special rules. The community doesn’t like it though. As for birth rate, that’s strictly for the Secular side. Orthodox women are, to put it bluntly, giving birth as a job. This is part of the issue between them and the Secular Jews that fund their lifestyle. Who the hell wants to pay high taxes so someone else’s family of 10 can live without working?