cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15985920

With the UAP disclosures came this, a breakdown of the most likely origins of UAPs

it’s from a video with the Colonel Nell that was in the discussion of the SOL foundation video with the same man

  • HM05@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is a great breakdown of potential origins. It’s important to note that the phenomenon is broad and will encompasses multiple origins on this chart.

    For anyone that wants more info on Colonel Karl Nell’s statements, there is the SOL foundation presentation this slide came from and Nell’s discussion at SALT where he stated “There’s zero doubt” that non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      There’s zero doubt” that non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

      This is just so preposterous.

      An entitity so advanced it could reach us from another planet, and yet it occasionally fails to conceal itself from us?

      We’re talking multiple orders of magnitude more advanced…as far as we currently understand, FTL is impossible (the energies required for space-folding concepts are beyond realistic).

      This is more misdirection by gov/military/intelligence agencies.

      • HM05@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        To start, the post is about a large range of proposed origin of UAP. Why did you latch onto extraterrestrial when it encompasses a small fraction of suggestions of what non-human intelligence could be?

        You then make the assumption that they are from another planet that would require FTL travel and that they are concerned about being seen.

        Did you look at this post and have you listened to Karl Nell’s discussions? It seems that you came in here to make an argument without understanding what you were arguing against.

        I’m not stating that Nell is right in his claims, but please at least address the claims he’s made.