• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This you?

    “Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to.”

    Are you agreeing that I never claimed that Joe was implicated by the emails? I just want to make sure you’re not confused again.

    I’m not asking you to prove this, I’m asking what the point is of even giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit.

    I’ll answer your question with a question. Why are you giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit?

    why you believe there are “good” white supremacists

    That is an outright lie I never made that claim. You had ample opportunities to provide the quote but you never did.

    your M.O. seems to just be to insult the other person and hyperfixate on the wrong aspect of a discussion while simultaneously being pretty fuckin rude to anyone that doesn’t give you a pass.

    Did you ever think it might be because you make false claims about me that I’m rude to you?

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Still cant back up your claims, and as any liar does when caught double down. Just keep trying to squirm, it doesn’t help, but it’s very entertaining.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Just keep making up lies, it’s all you got. We both know there was nothing incorrect about my original statement.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Not a surprise you have nothing meaningful to say.

                What from my original statement do you disagree with?

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I’ll take that as you don’t dispute anything in my original statement.

                    Once again you are asking for proof of something I never claimed to be true because you can’t find fault with my original statement.