• mriguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    People keep complaining that solar and wind give us “too much electricity at the wrong time”, causing power prices to go negative (as if this is a problem). Having a beneficial process like co2 removal that you can do at any time of day (the co2 isn’t going anywhere) that would soak up all that energy seems like a win win.

    • 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yea, and one of the best ways to sequester carbon dioxide is by using algae. Algae biofuels are a great way out of the climate crisis. Use excess energy to produce algae biofuel, net negative emissions.

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        But if it’s used as fuel, wouldn’t that typically return the CO2? Just about all fuels are burned, which creates the CO2, and you have to make sure the energy you use to make and transport the fuel is clean, too.

          • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            How does it stay net negative? Carbon goes into the fuel, which is good, but doesn’t like all of it come back out when burned for fuel? My understanding is that these fuels can only really achieve neutrality, and that assumes clean energy used to make the fuel.