• nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not necessarily, but I am counting down the days before we find out he’s been snorting coke off the erect dick of a male prostitute.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 days ago

          Which, by the way, the LGBTQXYZ+3 movement is a demonic-inspired movement. It’s totally demonic.

          How would you interpret what he said?

          • Mocking Moniker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            The organizations supporting the movement are acting on reasoning based on philosophy that Christianity has historically identified with the devil. It’s no joke his language is theological, i identify this as a Christian perspective. He’s probably identifying the philosophy since the organizations themselves he labels as demonic. Obviously, he never said the people are demonic, and as fake news this article is, they manipulate to say he’s accusing the homosexuals as being demonic. It’s a fake news tactic.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              You’re really splitting hairs to let this guy off the hook. He never mentioned organizations, he said “the movement”. The movement (the organizations too) is made up of people. Is the movement somehow demonic independent of the people in it? Are people advocating for demonic interests not themselves demonic?

              • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                I don’t 100% know if this is what mockingmoniker is getting at, but I want to give a word of possible explanation from my own perspective: Christians make a distinction between “sin” and “sinner” - or are at least supposed to. It’s my understanding from being sent to Christian school that people are decieved or led astray or get tempted or whatever, but it’s the actions that are “sinful” or “evil” or “demonic,” not the persons. This is the meaning of “hate the sin but love the sinner” - which is not actually in the bible btw. There are some verses that address this, for example Romans 5:8 or Ezekiel 33:11 in which God says he isn’t happy about the death of wicked people but would rather they turn from their ways and live. Look up that one- it literally says “turn back from your evil ways, for why do you die, Oh house of Israel?” Still relevant. But I’m going off topic.

                Of course, Christians are people too, and are generally pretty poor at following their own code of conduct. Also there are plenty of wolves in sheep’s clothing that use theological language for their own worldly goals, and it can be difficult to know which is which. Generally people in worldly positions of power that use theological language are the latter.

            • Snowclone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 days ago

              Why are you saying you’re a demon in this reply? Are you seriously saying you’re the demon of child sexual abuse? Why would you say exactly that in this reply? Horrible!!!