everyone’s going to pass the buck resolving it too, what a shit show
bare minimum he should get the ad revenues from the clowning, and the firms boosting it know who watched that shit to remove it and make sure they get a retraction…
Theoretically, won’t he able to sue outlets for libel for portraying him as some dumbass criminal? Or would they defend themselves by saying “well we just reported what the court said. It’s not our fault”
everyone’s going to pass the buck resolving it too, what a shit show
bare minimum he should get the ad revenues from the clowning, and the firms boosting it know who watched that shit to remove it and make sure they get a retraction…
Theoretically, won’t he able to sue outlets for libel for portraying him as some dumbass criminal? Or would they defend themselves by saying “well we just reported what the court said. It’s not our fault”