☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agoBiden: Hamas. Hamas could end this tomorrow. Hamas could say (unintelligible) and done period. You may not like it, but this is what peak statesmanship looks like.time.comexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1131cross-posted to: the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netpolitics@lemmy.worldpalestine@lemmygrad.mlpalestine@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1131external-linkBiden: Hamas. Hamas could end this tomorrow. Hamas could say (unintelligible) and done period. You may not like it, but this is what peak statesmanship looks like.time.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netpolitics@lemmy.worldpalestine@lemmygrad.mlpalestine@lemmy.ml
minus-squarespectre [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·29 days agoGood idea cause the views depend heavily on context, what countries are involved, and the existing trade relationships between the countries.
minus-squarePsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoIt mostly highlights how I view things. I’m not a huge fan of states using their citizens to fight over shit, so I have pretty reductio type views.
minus-squarespectre [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoThat’s fair, I don’t imagine most anyone here would disagree with the sentiment. But the next question is to start asking why it is that states end up fighting, right?
Good idea cause the views depend heavily on context, what countries are involved, and the existing trade relationships between the countries.
It mostly highlights how I view things. I’m not a huge fan of states using their citizens to fight over shit, so I have pretty reductio type views.
That’s fair, I don’t imagine most anyone here would disagree with the sentiment. But the next question is to start asking why it is that states end up fighting, right?