The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoIt's so overlemmy.worldimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.11K
arrow-up11.11KimageIt's so overlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoNow it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoAlso the “select the image below containing the example image above.” Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoSo that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
minus-squarebitwolf@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·29 days agoA common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize. It could be a precursor for that step.
Now it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
Also the “select the image below containing the example image above.”
Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
So that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
A common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize.
It could be a precursor for that step.