• SatouKazuma@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d treat this with a bit of skepticism, especially given Jeep’s recent history in terms of reliability (or utter lack thereof).

    • Kaboom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      Recent? Jeeps have never been reliable

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Oh, bullshit. They were fine before the Fiat takeover.

        I have 500k on a 98 GC 5.9L and 350k on the wife’s 98 4.0L. I doubt they’ve been down for 5 days total in this millenium and both are driven every day.

        • gdog05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Up to being bought by Chrysler in 1984 they were pretty solid. Because they were so basic. Not much to break, since they were boxes with wheels and that’s it. I had a 1990 YJ Wrangler and it was the biggest pile of shit I could imagine being assembled on purpose.

          • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            In the 80’s and 90’s? That was peak junk car era. You’d be lucky to have a car not rust out or need major repairs well before 100k miles.

            These fays, IF something breaks, it is extremely expensive to fix, but you can certainly expect to go a lot longer without a major problem.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Nah it was peak technology. We got things like fuel injection and ABS. There were standard radios. Components were simple, easy to diagnose, and inexpensive.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Wranglers have been mostly reliable but everything else has had issues. The newer pentastar engines seem to be doing pretty well. Not sure on the latest 4 cylinder engines or the Fiat models but the wrangler has been going pretty strong.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The 3.6L Pentastar is widely known to have the head gasket leak after 100K miles. Should be a recall but Stellantis won’t recognize it.

          • assembly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I thought that was limited to the Pacificas and everything else before they put it into the Wrangler. My understanding was that it was resolved by the time they finally started putting them in wranglers. I hated the older 3.8L engines and was super happy to get the 3.6. I still have low mileage so can’t comment on longevity but I think they may have resolved that.

              • assembly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                How many miles did it have and if you don’t mind me asking, what did it cost to fix? Did you just get the head gasket replaced or did you have to get the heads machined or a reman engine?

                • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  115K. Totaled the engine. Too far out of spec to machine. I wasn’t about to put more money into it. It was paid off too which sucked. Found out after the fact that this is a known defect on this engine. Note: it was not a Flex Fuel vehicle, or at least it wasn’t badged that way. Not sure if that affects anything reliability wise.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d risk that is true for the US models.

        The FIAT umbrella and the PSA line-up in Europe makes for a good chunk of the market with vehicles for all tastes.

        • SatouKazuma@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Shame the American Fiats are shit. I’d love to know the calculus behind dumping all the crap in the States.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            they dump it here because they know americans are idiots who will buy it.

            the amount of dodge dipshits and jeep junkies in this country is insane. and they know it’s shit, they just don’t care because of the marketing/branding that they are TOUGH AND COOL if they own a dodge/jeep product

            • SatouKazuma@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m talking about the US Fiat-branded cars. Forget the Dodges and Jeeps, even the US Fiat brand is dog shit.

              • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Really? That bad?

                FIAT in the 90’s and early 00’s went through a really bad phase, due to Ferrari sinking millions into F1, to the point FIAT Brazil was more active than FIAT Europe developing new models.

                FIAT are reliable. A few engines were less than good but FIAT has always been on the forefront of developing new technology into engines and cars. My first car, a cheap model, had direct fuel injection when most other manufacturers were still using carburettors (at best, eletrically controlled).

                It’s even a joke between owners that FIAT cars don’t like mechanics but when they start doing, you’re better off changing cars.

                • SatouKazuma@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Ah. Then FIAT must taking the European ones that don’t pass final checks and sending them Stateside. Idk.

                  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I tried to discover what was the line-up you have over there and it seems we get more from over there (essentially through the SUV line, from JEEP) than you receive from here.

                    What vehicles do you get under that badge?

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      And steering headlong into late-stage capitalism uber customization.

      A Jeep is still a bad vehicle, no matter how much they customize them for extra cash.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Recent history? They’ve been junk for a long time. I’ll give the Wrangler a pass but the rest of their lineup had been pretty terrible.