I updated the video’s link to SALT’s official video. I wasn’t expecting them to get the video up so fast, since their other videos seemed to take a while to be uploaded after events. Out of all of the NYC event’s discussions, this has been the first and only interview to get uploaded.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Great post. Been waiting for this.

    His immediate answer to the very first simple and direct question:

    Interviewer - do you believe that a higher form of non human intelligence has visited this planet?

    Nells response: Non human intelligence exists, … it’s been interacting with humanity, this interaction is not new and its been ongoing…

    Interviewer - how confident are you that that is true?

    Nell - there’s zero doubt.

    It’s just so cool to hear this. What do the debunkers say about Nell? He’s lying to get a book deal?

    • HM05@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve known his stance on the topic, but it’s still amazing to hear someone with his background stating that.

      David Grusch had originally been scheduled for this event, but I’m happy that Knell spoke in his place. I’m also glad that he listed off other names that have spoken out on NHI and UAP. At this point it feels like an open secret in government and the military that just needs a little more push to get officially addressed.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah I’m also glad Nell was Grusch’s replacement. The fact that these guys are/were really high up, clean slate, no bullshitters really hits hard. And how they say everything so “matter of fact”.

        This really feels like the slow/soft disclosure. The Schumer amendment, and importantly the portion that was gutted, is all a big part of it. How can people deny it now? Yes, we all want to see the “cool stuff” and really hard evidence, I get it. But I feel like the default position should be essentially what Nell said, that the gov’t has pretty much admitted to it. If debunkers want to say it’s all a conspiracy theory or scam, I feel like they need to provide some convincing evidence. I don’t think im asking to prove a negative given everything we have at this point.

        I’m still bitter about that amendment. Would love to be a “fly on the wall” in regards to the House Republicans that were responsible for the block. Were they payed out without being informed of why, or are they clued in? I could see them just taking money and being told just to block it, and what specifics to remove. We may never know. If we get full disclosure, it might not matter and be forgotten. I’d still like some accountability though, lol.