• ffmike@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My own high school debate days are decades in the past. From that perspective, though, the fact that you can easily look up the judges’ biases, and so prepare for them, is a huge advance that we would never have even dreamed of. To me that seems like explicitly addressing biases in a useful way.

    I’d be interested in a more serious analysis that went through all 47,000+ paradigms and categorized biases so some non-anecdotal conclusions could be drawn. That would take a lot more time and money than picking out a few instances that the writer knows about.

    And yes, if an alternative ends up being liked better by debate coaches, people will go in that direction. It’s entirely possible that debate competition will end up being as fragmented as national politics.

    • alanine96@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I actually really like the idea that people bring their biases/ideologies/paradigms to the table and you decide whether it’s worth using a particular argument to convince them. That is how political speech works, fundamentally.