• paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t worry, the same thing happened to Homer Simpson. Presumably, it could happen to anyone.

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      things disney+ doesn’t want you to know about

      (they removed the episode, for anyone wondering)

            • olutukko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              well he was ultra rich guy in usa with a LOT of lawyers and those 2 people in the documentary had pretty identical stories even though they were interviewed in separate palces without knowing each other in any way so (ツ) I do believe he was guilty as fuck.

              and I said “suspicions” and that literally is the reason why the episode is not on disney+ so I fail to see your point

              • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s a huge issue that our society deems it appropriate to punish people merely for accusations. We’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. There’s a very in-depth documentary about the entire scandal and it seems plausible that the parents of those children were looking for a big paycheck, not reporting truthfully. Unfortunately I don’t remember what the documentary is called. There’s a very real possibility that Michael Jackson wasn’t even interested in sex at all, like with anyone. They suspect that his children are actually the children of one of his friends and that he made arrangements for the friend to father kids for him.

                • olutukko@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  well the way I see it is that he didn’t get convicted simply because he was one of the most popular pop starts ever so he kinda gets sort of immunity based on that. you can almost never had concrete hard evidence on claim like that so it really just is all about whose story is more plausible.

                  but that’s just my personal opiniom about the case and whatever happened, happened. end of story on my part

                • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The court of law is innocent until proven guilty and has to be that way to ensure a fair trial.

                  Society and public opinion is a different beast.