In particular, it seems to me that centralization is almost a law of the universe (or at least a tendency). Lemmy may start decentralized, with dozens or hundreds of meaningfully-sized instances, but it’s easy to imagine a not-far future where most everyone has settled on just a handful of instances (or even just one).

I don’t mean to just be a pessimist here. I’m sure I’m far from the first person to wonder about this, and I’m curious whether there are ideas of how to counterbalance the tendency toward centralization.

  • N12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    while that is true, finding and joining new /c’s is klunky atm and not set up in a way that makes large growth likely

    • ScottE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely. As much as a centralized /c namespace is against all the principles of a decentralized system, lack of a centralized namespace results in topical duplication and hinders discovery. I don’t know how, but seems to me some sort of happy medium has to fall out.