The number of structurally deficient bridges is actually down by about 7,000 from 2017, but those bridges weren’t fixed. The number fell because the Federal Highway Administration weakened the standards of what it means for a bridge to be deficient, the report explains.

joker-amerikkklap

The collapse of a bridge earlier this week in Tennessee is raising new alarms about the delicate state of infrastructure across the U.S.

    • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well if you fixed your shit instead of buying shells for Gaza, you’d have a working bridge in the DC area right now.

      I’m sorry af for the workers who were there, but it’s hard not to feel al bit of satisfaction after all the Amerikan aggression lately.

  • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    i was like “a bridge collapsed in TN?” This article is from 2019 so that makes sense why I didnt remember this.

    Also for that particular bridge

    The collapse of a concrete beam from a bridge in Chattanooga, Tennessee was likely caused when a vehicle carrying an oversized load hit the bottom of the bridge, a state transportation official said Tuesday.

    The vehicle went under the bridge and sliced through some of the steel reinforcement strands in the exterior beam, Paul Degges, the department’s chief engineer, told reporters. A concrete rail helped support the damaged beam but ultimately it collapsed, he said.

    Guess it’s good Biden got an infrastructure deal passed, I’m pretty sure Trump failed on that one. I know the Biden one is fixing a very old bridge near me. And the next one will actually have pedestrian crossings instead of a glorified curb to walk on. The new bridge will connect two communities instead of severing them. Fucking finally.

  • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    In this specific case, is it reasonable to expect any bridge to survive getting hit by a massive container ship? Would a “sufficient” bridge have at least held together long enough for people to escape?

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apparently there the answer is to either put the pylons in shallow enough water that big ships physically cannot reach them, or to create artificial reefs around them so that big ships physically cannot reach them. This particular bridge seems to have been uncommonly vulnerable compared to similarly large bridges over shipping lanes, because the closest supports to the channel where big ships can fit were closer together than is normal and they lacked any sort of artificial reef barrier, even though the water depth near them would have allowed barriers to be built.

  • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    By harnessing American ingenuity and eliminating the regulatory barriers to modernization, we can solve this problem the same way we solved poverty, inflation, and unemployment: if you vote hard enough in November, we can come together to change the metrics by which structural deficiency is measured.