Vehicle theft is an issue that affects us all collectively. As cybersecurity and technology professionals, we recognize the importance of acting rapidly to reduce its impact on Canadians. That being said, we believe the federal government’s proposal, particularly the prohibition of security research tools, is ill-advised, overbroad and most importantly, will be counterproductive.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Maybe we just not ban anything and accept a little crime.

    We can then instead focus on relieving the fundamental imbalances in society that result in people needing to commit crime in pursuit of a better life.

    Society can have a little crime, as a treat.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having your car broken into or stolen because it has a lock that is useless would suck. This seems like one of those times a basic consumer protection regulation would make the most sense.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you think that the lock on your car is why it hasn’t been stolen? Perhaps you aren’t storing it correctly? Maybe we should mandate that all cars must be stored in a garage, our of public sight.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago
          1. Models of cars that are easy to hotwire, for example, get stolen at a higher rate.

          2. ‘Having a garage’ is up to the consumer and often impractical and/or expensive. That’s pretty different in various ways from a company having to follow some standards for implementing encryption.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    You aren’t going to defeat the stupidity of politicians that have no clue what they’re legislating about.