• Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Coal will be phased out in 2038

    More than 30 years too late… If, instead, these morons had phased out coal FIRST and relied on Nuclear for the transition, how much damage could we have avoided from the imesureable destruction climate change has caused?

    • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know. I can also ask: How much damage could have been avoided if Chernobyl and Fukushima would have not been built. But IMHO this makes no sense since these hypothetical scenarios are not the topic of this discussion.

      • Gabu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure thing, astroturfer. Funny, 8 months not posting anything, then suddenly defending oil interests like a guard dog.

        • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s called interest. I made clear on multiple occasions that being against nuclear power does not make me a proponent of fossil fuel power production. I think we have to get rid of fossil fuel power production as well as nuclear power production.

          Please refrain from personal attacks and try to discuss using credible sources and arguments. Hers a primer on discussion skills: https://www.student.unsw.edu.au/discussion-skills