No you did not. You always addressed the point that we could build a long term storage facility. But these are not existant in Germany and as long as that’s the case we should not produce more nuclear waste. You did never address this point.
Yes, and I will: As long as there is no adequate long term storage facility we should not produce more nuclear waste.
Maybe you can try addressing this argument instead of resorting to evasion or ad hominem fallacies.
No you did not. You always addressed the point that we could build a long term storage facility. But these are not existant in Germany and as long as that’s the case we should not produce more nuclear waste. You did never address this point.
You can keep repeating that all you like. Anybody reading this thread can judge for themselves.
Yes, and I will: As long as there is no adequate long term storage facility we should not produce more nuclear waste. Maybe you can try addressing this argument instead of resorting to evasion or ad hominem fallacies.
The fact that you keep pretending that your argument hasn’t been addressed is what makes this whole thing so hilarious.
Evasion fallacy again. No arguments given no valid points made.
You keep on repeating that if that makes you feel better.
Yes I will as long as you do not engage in a civil discussion, employ fallacies and do not offer arguments or sources to support your opinion.
good for you buddy
No source, no argument, just evasion again. Try supporting your opinion next time and you might make a valid point, but not like this.