ngl russia is not making it easy to give critical support lol

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s more politically expedient to use symbols that are homegrown rather than symbols from a foreign place that’s hostile to your home country. Symbols mean different things to different people. From the perspective of the US and the West in general, the rainbow flag is a symbol of queer liberation, but from the perspective of people not from the West, the rainbow flag is just some pinkwashing bullshit. You can’t just ignore the non-Western reading of the symbol especially when we’re talking about what the rainbow means in non-Western countries. It makes a lot more political sense to just find different symbols that actually come from the local culture. By embracing the Western symbol, you’re already subtly insinuating that queerness is some Western invention, which is a queerphobic talking point.

    There’s nothing inherently queer about rainbows. Gay people don’t piss out rainbows, and trans people don’t shit out rainbows. Rainbows are just symbols, which means they ought to be judged based on political expediency on whether to adopt them and where and who to display them to like any other symbol.

    • WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      By embracing the Western symbol, you’re already subtly insinuating that queerness is some Western invention, which is a queerphobic talking point.

      Ok, but like… I’m not

      People can use whatever symbols they want, the argument isn’t over whether or not they come from the West, but if they’re inherently some sort of imperialism by their mere existence that implies the need for violence

      • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        People can use whatever symbols they want,

        And people will interpret those symbols whatever they want as well. Political symbols serve a political purpose, and if they are detrimental to whatever political project they are trying to accomplish, then they ought to be discarded.

        • WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But if it doesn’t make sense why I’m arguing so hard, it’s because the phrase “western values” sort of implies this weird connotation that, beyond simply being a symbol people associate with direct US influence, it is associated with some sort of evil, insidious gay worldview. This might seem like splitting hairs but it tread so close to Nazbol territory to defend that specific terminology that it freaks me out. If it was just “western symbols” or “probability of being a western spy” it would make perfect sense, but “western values” conjures images of hordes of scheming Untermench soft-men carving away the fabric of strong insert country here society.

          As if the issue is the things these organizations claim to support and not the fact they are blatant lies. Gay liberation being a “western value” is about as true as democracy, as in, not at all (we just pretend it is so we can have Cassus Belli on random countries). If we try to compensate for every possible concept the US tries to appropriate then we’re going to end up having insane positions like “war crimes are actually good because the US said they weren’t” (probably with the context of the US lying about them happening in the first place)

          Like, imagine if we responded to claims of the “Uyghur genocide” by claiming that being against genocide is a Western value being pushed on unwilling countries, instead of just pointing out the very obvious fakery of the whole thing. People would rightfully call us sociopaths and monsters.