• moriquende@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Your argument against removable batteries is that they had a “flimsy plastic back”? seriously prefer being unable to change the battery when its capacity decreases, being unable to carry a spare battery around, and having to pay dumb service fees, all just to not have a back that you barely even notice is made of plastic?

    Also removable storage is extremely useful as well, not only for being able to cheaply increase space when needed, but also to minimize the effort of swapping devices or sharing large files more quickly.

    Modular is always better. The only good argument against it is shareholder profits.

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t even need to be plastic. The battery could slot into the side of the phone on a tray with a gasket to try and seal it.

      Personally I don’t think the battery needs to be as easily replaced if it lasts longer. Lithium ion cells degrade too quickly but a lithium iron phosphate cold last for 10 years before dropping below 85% charge capacity.

      The only drawback is they have about 30% less energy density but imo making the battery 30% larger is not a big deal. Phones have obsessed with being pointlessly thin for so long. Basically just remove the dumb camera bump.