Sorry you take offense. I just didn’t provide a fully comprehensive reply, and don’t need someone who just learned about this to educate me on the subject.
It’s more for the benefit of anyone else reading who may be interested. I’m sure you know what you’re doing. I haven’t used traditional credit card services in a while (I ran a retail store and art business 2000-2012 or so).
Goddamn, what are you smoking? I meant this wasn’t needed
That’s great. You sound really awesome.
Your prior comment before that with the link provided zero context that you didn’t expect a reply from me and that it was for others’ benefit, so without such context, the logical conclusion was that you were under the impression I needed to read something, and I just responded that I didn’t need to read it because my practices were already vetted.
So you could have just skipped the above useless reply, and gone straight to explaining it was for others’ benefit and saved us both the waste of time for even this most recent reply, or just provided that context with the link to begin with.
Or maybe even considered that in the 10 years since you dealt with credit cards that maybe something had changed, and just looked it up instead of providing disinformation for me to debunk in the first place.
Yes, I did look it up. It’s more complex than that, though.
This site sums it up: https://www.lendingtree.com/credit-cards/articles/surcharges-and-convenience-fees/
good for you, my practices have been well vetted, so I’m not wasting my time reading it.
That’s great. You sound really awesome.
Sorry you take offense. I just didn’t provide a fully comprehensive reply, and don’t need someone who just learned about this to educate me on the subject.
It’s more for the benefit of anyone else reading who may be interested. I’m sure you know what you’re doing. I haven’t used traditional credit card services in a while (I ran a retail store and art business 2000-2012 or so).
So then you probably should have indicated that so I was aware of your intention, and either way your last reply wasn’t needed.
My original comment said “Maybe that’s changed, idk.” Clearly this entire conversation wasn’t needed.
Goddamn, what are you smoking? I meant this wasn’t needed
Your prior comment before that with the link provided zero context that you didn’t expect a reply from me and that it was for others’ benefit, so without such context, the logical conclusion was that you were under the impression I needed to read something, and I just responded that I didn’t need to read it because my practices were already vetted.
So you could have just skipped the above useless reply, and gone straight to explaining it was for others’ benefit and saved us both the waste of time for even this most recent reply, or just provided that context with the link to begin with.
Or maybe even considered that in the 10 years since you dealt with credit cards that maybe something had changed, and just looked it up instead of providing disinformation for me to debunk in the first place.