MrSebSin@sh.itjust.worksM to Cyanide and Happiness@lemm.ee · 6 months ago3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1542
arrow-up1542image3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksMrSebSin@sh.itjust.worksM to Cyanide and Happiness@lemm.ee · 6 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up52·edit-26 months agoI mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
minus-squareVindictiveJudge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·6 months ago “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
minus-squareIgloojoe@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoI always heard it was fern gully remake.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 months agoAnd some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.
I mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to
“It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.”
The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism
All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
I always heard it was fern gully remake.
And some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.