• jtmetcalfe@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hate it too but there’s a reason books have a portrait resolution, it’s easier to scan when you’re holding it in front of your face

      • ᕮᐯIᒪ Tᕼᕮ ᑕᗩT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        takes a deep breath

        Okay, let’s do an autopsy of your reply:

        1. Books don’t have a resolution. They’re paper.

        2. “Portrait” is an orientation, not a resolution.

        3. Movies aren’t books.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        My guy, books were portrait-oriented because you can get more words on paper that way. They were literally made before phones were even a thing.