deleted by creator
In San Francisco, under the in-law and illegal space legislation of 2016, tenants are granted the right to refuse an inspector onto the premises. So for the San Francisco area, residents are granted the right to refuse inspectors into the building.
This doesn’t prevent the inspectors from lodging a formal complaint, which SF has indicated that, that’s exactly what they’re going to do with Musk’s office. This would start throwing the whole thing into civil court which can lead to civil penalties. Which combined with Musk not paying rent in several locations and facing evictions and the associated fees with that, any penalties will just be added to the pile of money that he’s currently setting “ablaze”.
San Fransisco is going to spend hundreds of millions in court fees trying to get a look at that sign.
That’s good information, thanks for sharing
When you’re rich, they let you do it.
So you’re telling me.
That the motherfucking, code enforcement officers of San Francisco.
Don’t have a drone.
I would guess lots of the inspection involves seeing how they tied into the building, tough to inspect that with a drone.
deleted by creator
But still can’t check but torque or see under flashing or membrane roofing material.
I do rich I could do all my elevated structural inspections with a drone, but we’re not there yet.
I bet there’s a drone in Ukraine right now with a working torque wrench attached
What kind of torque, what kind of drone, are we talking? I’ll take that bet any day of the week.
So, they admit that the sign is unsafe then. Good to know. jots down notes
Money is the ultimate shield.
Fucking crazy how much you can just openly flip the bird to the law when you have enough lawyers.
This sign is a cancer and is such an unforced dick move to all the neighbors of that building.
Is this a long con to get SF to condemn the building, so they can get out of paying for it somehow?
That sign is so goddamned tacky.
deleted by creator
