• Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    7 months ago

    The previous government had running infrastructure, hospitals, electricity, clean water, etc. before the American regime bombed them and plunged the region into chaos so as to install puppet governments that allowed the U.S regime to pillage their resources and inflate the stock portfolios of the war criminals that run the American regime.

    Zero justification for supporting the actions of the American terrorist regime.

      • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You’re really conflating seething hatred for America destroying a country with praise for Saddam Hussein? You reactionaries really can’t see in anything beyond binary terms, can you?

        Saddam was fucking atrocious, but Iraq had working infrastructure under him (and his rise to power was aided by the US, so he was another pawn)

        They had that torn apart courtesy of America and are only just building back

        • jack55555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No I got no love for what the US and the allies did to Iraq, but what good is the the running water they had for the dead Kurds? From the start, my argument was they are better off now. Not that they are in paradise now.

          • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Better off how? I pointed out their power grid is shit, their water table is contaminated, their buildings are bombed out, and everything but their oil has been privatized. Materially, they’re fucked 3 ways to Sunday.

            If you’re trying to still make digs about ‘supporting Saddam killing Kurds’ or w/e, I’ll point out again that Saddam had the full backing of the US until Kuwait

            And you can get rid of people like him without invading the country and tearing it asunder

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            ·
            7 months ago

            The Americans did not care about the people Saddam killed, and they killed millions more Iraqis then he ever did, you’re a delusional racist and a war worshiping dipshit

            • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              43
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Apparently this bozo’s feelings

              Motherfucker is acting like all libs, like this is some marvel movie shit to them where after the US got Saddam, all the ‘good guys’ stood on top of a building in downtown Baghdad at night and said ‘We have hope now’ and then the credits rolled

              They forgot this is real life

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes I’m sure the Kurds situation has been improved greatly by not having running water or electricity.
                By the way, who gave Saddam that gas?

              • MoreAmphibians [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                The Kurds killed with chemical weapon technology supplied by the US? The killings that the US tried to frame Iran for? After which the US refused to sanction Iraq and continued to provide dual-use technology to Iraq.

                Those dead Kurds?

          • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They don’t have functional infrastructure 20 years after the war and they did under Saddam. You really think the US was interested in anything besides cannibalizing the country for resources?

            edit: Oh yeah, they were interested in one other thing: handing lucrative ”rebuilding” contracts to corporations like Halliburton with direct ties to the Bush admin.

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m with you. It’s not fair to make judgments based on the material reality of people’s lives. You clearly said the word dictator, which means bad guy from an exotic locale. You won the argument. What are all these commies talking about?

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fucking libs, man. Give them the slightest push against their preconceived notions and they immediately start slinging shit instead of relating to the arguments at hand.
        “Hey here’s some facts about how life was measurably better before we bombed the shit out of Iraq”.
        “Whatever you love Saddam”.

        You would have supported the Iraq war. You would have supported the Vietnam war. You would have supported the Kent state shootings. You would have eagerly reported local communists during the red scare.

        Please acquire some critical thinking skills you cretin