• BobaFuttbucker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, I think we should limit the cost of drugs based solely on cost to manufacture and distribute, and pay those operational costs.

    I think we should expect to receive healthcare from medical professionals and pay them for their time and operational costs.

    I think private health insurance existing as an optional, supplemental option is a step in the correct direction.

    I think profiting off such a system is parasitic to our wellbeing and detrimental to the betterment of society.

    Ultimately we need to look at healthcare and education as an investment in our country’s well-being.

    A population that is healthy, educated and safe is a population that is happier, can fight off threats better and innovate more. A country that fails to produce an effective population is not a successful country for long.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, I think we should limit the cost of drugs based solely on cost to manufacture and distribute, and pay those operational costs

      If we payed for the research. I agree. Otherwise companies will just spend less on research. I don’t mind capping margins unless they don’t enforce the patent.

      • BobaFuttbucker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah research is part of the cost to manufacture cause you first need to know what you’re making hahaha.

        Margin-capping isn’t even something to consider when you don’t run it for profit. with wages for workers included in the cost to manufacture and distribute there’s no need to profit further.

        I think the people should own the means of production where it makes sense. Healthcare is an obvious example because it’s a service directly for us.

        People getting rich and making millions off the suffering of an unhealthy population is morally wrong.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If there is no profit, then nobody would make it.

          think the people should own the means of production where it makes sense.

          It never makes sense. You can do that now, but nobody does because it doesn’t make sense.

          • BobaFuttbucker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            If there is no profit, then nobody would make it.

            You forgot the part where I said their pay is considered part of the cost to manufacture and distribute.

            Non-profits have no problem staying staffed.

            It absolutely makes sense for the people to own the mechanism that directly benefits their wellbeing, yes.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Then why haven’t you started this business? Sounds like you have it all figured out

              • BobaFuttbucker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because we need congressional action to make it legal, and to make the current system of profiteering off healthcare illegal.

                I would love to be a part of those discussions and fully intend to continue doing so ;)

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It is already legal. You can start your own company tomorrow and make it a non-profit. So why haven’t you done it?

                  • BobaFuttbucker
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Because even that is too much overhead. Non-profits don’t profit because they have to spend every penny they have left over on operating expenses.

                    Just pay it from our taxes, like the countries with working Healthcare that Rob mentioned in the post. Clearly he has recognized that’s doable, and a surplus wouldn’t be a violation, it would be a surplus for the next year.