• BobaFuttbucker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The “everybody knows” argument roughly translates to “I don’t actually have anything but I’m counting on a larger consensus to validate my opinion for me.”

    Not substantial enough dude. Until I see something factual I’m just going to interpret this as your feeling and not a compelling point in this conversation.

    You seem to have a grade school-level understanding of international politics. Not only is that not how they work, you’re misremembering. Russia did not attack us in Syria, he retaliated against Syria over a chemical attack. Russia took Syria’s side and opposed the US response to the counterattack.

    I guess you just don’t have anything substantial to argue with.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not substantial enough dude. Until I see something factual I’m just going to interpret this as your feeling and not a compelling point in this conversation.

      Nothing would be factual enough for you.

      Russia did not attack us in Syria

      Don’t hurl insults especially when you don’t know what you are talking about.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/world/middleeast/american-commandos-russian-mercenaries-syria.html

      We fought Wagner and killed over 300. Putin learned trump want fucking around anymore.

      • BobaFuttbucker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your source just says there were mercenaries, and paints a picture of horror if Russia actually sent troops and attacked, which means they didn’t. Thanks for proving me right!

        What insults?

          • BobaFuttbucker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Please explain how this is Biden’s fault, or makes Biden an unfit president.

            So far you’ve just alluded that “Russia would never attack if Trump was president.” First, we don’t actually know that. Second, Trump’s actions were to weaken Ukraine’s defense against Russia, further enabling the attack’s success once it was carried out.

            Third, Trump tried to add conditions onto aid already appropriated to Ukraine by congress.

            All you’ve got is optics. Still no substance.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Second, Trump’s actions were to weaken Ukraine’s defense against Russia

              Another liberals gas lighting attempt. Trump is the first president to sell lethal weapons to Ukraine. Had he not done that, Russia would have taken over Ukraine in the first month.

              • BobaFuttbucker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Trump tried to quid pro quo congressionally approved funds to Ukraine, necessary to defend themselves. He didn’t have to sell anything to them, and still tried to add strings to aid congress already approved to get dirt on Biden.

                It’s not gaslighting when it’s true.