• FlaminGoku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    How about we stop splitting up everything into money grabbing bits. Looking at you, Hobbit. Three fucking movies out of the shortest (by a significant margin) book.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      The first part was pretty short too, even doing most of the side content. A few things were too bullshit for me even and I’m totally deranged enough to get all achievements for multiple editions of the same game.

      • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        First part felt like a DLC but was executed well. Rebirth on the other hand feels like a very bad Xenoblade with worse combat and even worse world design.

        • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I disagree with this take.

          I thought the world design was a decent balance of open and linear levels. Xenoblade is massive no doubt but often times I’ve found myself wishing it was more…dense I guess? Now I am not a fan of the obvious Ubisoft towers/icons in Rebirth but it is a very lively world where everything feels intentional.

          Xenoblade combat is more akin to MMO combat compared to FF7 Rebirth. Rebirth’s combat is surprisingly deep with its ATB/real time combat. Having to juggle three characters simultaneously and set up your stagger/damage phases is really engaging. Xenoblade felt more like a rhythm game until the end stage bosses where positioning and execution suddenly became really important.

          I say this as a Xenoblade fan, your comparison is apples to oranges.