• monsterpiece42
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Man, come on. The ONLY time imperial makes some decent sense is temperature: for humans, 0 is really cold and 100 is really hot.

    Edit: for anyone metric having a cow here, I am pro-metric. All I’m trying to say is that of all the hairbrained measurements in imperial, temperature is the least hairbrained.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Ah, yes. Subjectivity.

      Pretty much no one uses F°

    • HankMardukas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      100 is unacceptably hot. Nobody can live in that for long.

      86f peak temperature with 35% humidity? Tolerable. Especially when the sun goes down and the temp drops but the humidity stays lower than like 55%.

      But the next day of 95f peak temp followed by 76f nadir with 70% humidity overnight? People without A/C die. The homeless die.

      • jasory@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        What? Tropical regions regularly get that hot, are we supposed to believe that humans die off during the day and get replaced in the night?

        I live in Maricopa county, and while yes people do die from the heat, it’s not really a substantial amount (about 400 out of over 4 million). It’s almost always the elderly or people with severe health problems.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You should have linked a physiology reference.

            Do you know what temperature a hot tub is? That’s with nearly full body immersion, 40 C with 70 percent humidity is easily survivable.

            Of course any outside temperature above 37 has a possibility of killing you, but those are the extreme outliers. If the claims being made here were accurate, humans wouldn’t exist, we would never have survived a tropical summer.

            • agarorn@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Of course you don’t die instantly. The guy above talked about temperatures like that over a longer period, i. E. A whole day.

              People can survive 100C+ saunas for 15+ minutes. But 40C and 100% humidity will kill you after a couple hours.

              • jasory@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Again, no. As long as you can replenish water and electrolytes, you’re not going to die. It doesn’t take a few hours to kill someone by heat. If you are actually unable to regulate your body temperature, your core temperature will increase much faster than “taking a whole day”. It’s the loss of water and electrolytes that inihibits your metabolism and cooling that makes you die, not the heat taking several hours to permeate through your skin. (Human metabolism generates a lot of heat, so this idea is even more absurd if you think about it).

                Read a physiology textbook, or even basic evolutionary biology if a human couldn’t survive 40C with humidity, humans would be extinct.

                • agarorn@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It seems like you talk about sweating - thats why you talk about the replenish water and ectrolytes part. I hope you know how sweating works and that it only works if the humidity is not too high.

                  So what do you think happens if the air temperature is over your body temperature and sweating dies not cool you down?

                  Maybe you should read a book. I am really curious about a biology text book that will tell me that 40C and 100% humidity is totally fine for humans for survive, lol.

                  Please start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature?wprov=sfla1

                  • jasory@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Literally so ignorant. Sweating is not the only way to lose heat. How much heat does the body generate?

                    The fact that people may die from a certain temperature, does not mean they will die which is what every person here is claiming. Again read a physiology textbook, humans aren’t that fragile.

      • ScottyB@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Small world views. Places have hotter temps than that and more rural communities and do fine.

        Not doubting your comment, but it is just localised to wherever you sourced that.

    • darcy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      your right. there is no true ‘objective’ scale for temperature. freezing/boiling water is arbitrary and not even that consistent. for 99% of use, farenheit is better for people. the biggest advantage that celsius has, is that it is the same scale as kelvin, but thats just because it was more popular in science. the rest of metric is good tho