• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If you mention that the soviet union used tear gas in rare instances and therefore they’re authoritarian then I mention that the US frequently tear gasses protestors and BLM organizers keep showing up having shot themselves in the back of the head twice and you dont call them authoritarian that’s “whataboutism” and it isnt a fallacy, it is providing context that points out hypocrisy.

      You dont want to understand yourself to be a hypocrite but you don’t want to change, is what it boils down to. So you do the though terminating “whataboutism” and you can ignore it.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s a shitty way of separating it though. It relies on knowing authorial intent which is impossible. You can project whatever you want onto the other person and based on that theyre either doing a logical fallacy or not.