• irmoz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Easy

    Inequality is caused by hierarchy

    Remove hierarchy

    Inequality is solved

      • irmoz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not really, because gravity is a law of physics, while hierarchy is an arbitrary social construct. If you think it’s natural to have people above you, that might be your kink, but not mine.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re both about as easy to arbitrarily remove… Your kink seems to be fantasy so get out your wand and get to work.

          • irmoz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Social constructs are infinitely easier to remove than fundamental forces of the universe. Don’t hyperbolise.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Actually, its extremely accurate if you consider every aspect of nature is built off hierarchies. You think you can just wave a wand and remove it when every aspect of society is built off it. You’re either extremely naive or just stupid.

              • irmoz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Nature also reproduces primarily through rape. Think twice before learning from nature.

                You think you can just wave a wand and remove it when every aspect of society is built off it

                Who mentioned wands?

      • irmoz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My dude

        They are monkeys

        We have a bit more intelligence and organisational skill than wild animals

        • PP_GIRL_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          So you’re saying that, with our intelligence, we can organize ourselves better than animals and not fall into… anarchy?

          • irmoz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            If we organised ourselves properly, that would be anarchy. “Fall into anarchy” suggests you believe anarchy means chaos and disorder. It doesn’t.

        • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          But you still need to for lack of better word force people to partake in mutual aid? Right? That’s what I don’t understand about these discussions.

          I tend to think more about chaos and war. Like chaos and war seems to be what life is regardless of any active governments.

          • irmoz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            you still need to for lack of better word force people to partake in mutual aid? Right?

            What makes you say this? You think, despite tens of thousands of years of evidence that humans work best as a cohesive unit, and naturally tend to do this, that humans can’t work together?

            • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I’ve known a lot of criminals/thieves and people that ruin people’s lives on purpose. They don’t budge for anything. The type of people that would kick the shit out of you because you accidentally made the wrong face or smiled wrong. I’ve seen people fuck up lives just for their own entertainment. Its really made me question life and society.

              • irmoz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yes, I also question society, and that is what I’m getting at. The society we have built actively encourages behaviour like this - we’re built around a zero sum game theory of success, where one person’s loss is another’s gain. Hyper individualistic ideology has eroded communities into pure atomised subjects with no connection to each other. We are taught and forced to only think of only ourselves, better only ourselves, further only our own careers, because any moment you take to help someone else, they are somehow “leeching” off of you. And, in a sense, they are, because of how we have set our society, economy, and political systems up. Those moments you take to help other people are moments you could be making money for yourself, or learning something for your own self improvement… And in a real sense could hurt you.