Have to say, I wasn’t expecting this in my feed. It is a bit novel of a concept, but if you think about what it takes to build and ship a product, a lot of this makes sense, and modern languages are starting to follow the batteries included mentality (golang, rust).

There’s even an ironic naming ecosystem that just lends itself to this personification: flatpak and containers.

  • variouslegumes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is basically the unix philosophy. Build a bunch of separate apps that can be hooked together (via pipes).

    • jadero@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sort of. I think of the Unix philosophy as being like Lego. Here’s a box of goodies, go crazy. Even Ikea still requires user assembly.

      Most end users just can’t do much with the first and often even get tripped up by the second. What we need is something in between that a programmer can use to quickly throw something together to user requirements.

      Actually, that’s much like what I was doing with Microsoft Access and Visual Basic decades ago. I probably would never have survived in an actual software development shop, but I was kept very busy by a bunch of small businesses that loved the quick turnaround and manageable costs.