• lightnsfw
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do they actually trust their coworkers to run the company without tanking it almost immediatly? Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks without fucking something up, let alone actually having input on how the business is run.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Highly depends on your coworkers. My current coworkers? Yeah they’re great, we have two electrical engineers on my team, buncha geniuses.

        My last job? Oh man I wouldn’t trust those guys as far as I could throw em.

    • Infynis@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks without fucking something up

      This is a problem with the company you work for, not your coworkers. I’m sure if they were paid more, were given more agency, and received better training, they’d be better elployees

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Either that or the reason they purposefully hire meth-addled freaks is because they want desperate people who won’t fight for any of those things.

        Source: Friend who works in a warehouse and has coworkers who are obviously there to get a paycheck to afford their fix and then move on. It’s the company culture. They could choose to hire better people, or mentor the people who could grow, they don’t.

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, they’re just idiots. Myself and others have had the same training and responsibilities and do fine. It’s not that difficult of a job.

        • hexachrome [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          9 months ago

          i shall surely reap the rewards of working at the same level as these irredeemably dumb people. then i will prove my point online or something

        • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like you’re just an extra special boy. Surely that’s the only explanation to literally all of your coworkers doing their job badly.

          • lightnsfw
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I didn’t say all I said most. It’s really probably not even most just a large enough portion of them that there’s always some issue going on caused by their negligence.

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Sounds like you’re just a mostly special boy then. Surely that’s the only explanation to literally most of your coworkers doing their job badly.

        • potpie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not just about treating current employees well. It’s also about offering enough at the hiring stage to attract more good workers. Higher starting pay and a better reputation as a place to work means more people applying, means that Methface Matt can’t compete with TypeA Teresa to get hired in the first place.

          • lightnsfw
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            People lie in their interviews all the time. The amount of conversations I’ve had with my boss regarding people he’s hired that turned out be idiots that have started with “I don’t know what happened with that dude, he seemed totally normal in the hiring process”. We’re also restricted in what questions we can ask during interviews because asking people probing questions is apparently not fair according to our HR dept which makes it pretty easy for them to BS their way in. Then we’re stuck with their dumb asses for months before HR lets us fire them.

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks

      I guess you haven’t met many CEOs, then.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You must need a better job. I’ve had plenty of workplaces where I could count on everyone around me.

      You know, the hiring manager usually has something to do with the quality of people hired. Maybe you could talk to them instead?

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        That doesn’t really change the overall point. People are stupid. It’s the single biggest sticking point in democracy, socialism, communism, really anything except dictatorship/technocracy/oligarchy/etc. Any system where you cede power to the masses runs the risk of the masses being utterly stupid.

        I think it’s worth it, because stupid is better than evil, but it’s still a point worth considering.

    • AcidMarxist [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      if you dont raise your children to be adults, they won’t act like adults when they grow up. A revolution would mean people learning entirely new skills, like making decisions in the workplace. Most workers have no agency, theyre treated like machines, so I dont expect people raised in that society to know how to run a completely different one from scratch. Revolution is a process, it has to be built. Keep shitting on your coworkers tho, im sure its a productive activity

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        They can’t even learn to do the tasks they are expected to do now. Even with frequent coaching. How the fuck can you expect them to learn to make business decisions?

          • CriticalResist8 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I used to work for a food type company and the way they decided to import and sell stuff locally was if the board of directors (the CEO who inherited the company from daddy + his siblings) liked the item. They hired someone, my coworker, to actually run the market tests and everything and then promptly ignored any suggestion she had to make about the viability of this product on the local market, instead relegating her to a busser that was in charge of ordering the samples they decided they wanted.

            I remember one item nobody liked (they would give us the remaining samples in the break room like some dogs getting the leftovers), but one of the siblings liked it and they got that close to putting it on the market because of it.

              • CriticalResist8 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                I have so many stories from there. At the end of the year they would sell the soon to be expired stock to the employees for like half the price. On paper it was half (you’re just giving money back to your employer so fuck them I stole as much food as I could), but the person who actually took the money was super nice and often gave us further discounts. For them the difference was like a decimal in accounting.

                They announced these sales by email with the time and date. And in 2020, the year of covid, when half the workforce was working from home, they made the sale as usual. I learned afterwards that on that morning, the siblings who owned the company went and parked their cars right in front of the warehouse where the sale took place, and filled the trunk with as much stuff as they could. Then 2 hours later the sale happened and there was almost nothing left.

                Technically legal but a fucking shitty thing to do lol, your job is to have a blurry monitor and pretend to do Excel sheets and you drive a Porsche, I think you have the means to load up your car at the store like a grown adult if you need to.

        • AcidMarxist [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          9 months ago

          same way we expect students in 9th grade to be capable of more complicated tasks once they’re in 12th grade. The nature of labor in capitalist countries is to sort out wheat from chaffe. “Good” workers become managers (although this is theoretical, ive had plenty of shitty managers), leaving the “bad” workers down at the bottom. This how the economy works right now, but it doesnt always have to. For example, unions sometimes have a probation period where you work as a temp, then join the union after a month or two. This gives you time to learn the job, before you have a say in how things are organized.

          I have more thoughts, but im working rn 😝

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Good" workers become managers.

            These days it’s mainly external hires, but it used to be you got promoted to incompetence. You do a job well, you get promoted. You don’t do it well and you don’t get promoted. Thus you get stuck doing something you’re bad at

        • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like a structural issue. Your coworkers are overworked or underpaid or not informed correctly for the job they’re given. Maybe they know they’re not skilled, but the job is the only one available to them and since they need the money they’re stuck doing something theyre unskilled at. These are but a few systemic problems that might lie to reason.
          Ask yourself this: If all your coworkers are bad at their job, are you just an extra special boy, or might there be something wrong going on?

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks without fucking something up, let alone actually having input on how the business is run.

      Your coworkers aren’t incompetent. Your coworkers are just half-assing at work because they correctly realize they’re not going to get paid more if they actually tried.

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        So they’re just selfish assholes that don’t mind creating more work for everyone else and potentially putting people’s safety at risk? That doesn’t do anything to convince me that they should have a say in how the business is run. If they’re not happy with their pay they can go elsewhere.

          • lightnsfw
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Where did I say anything about helping the business? I don’t expect them to go above and beyond, when they don’t do their assigned tasks correctly their coworkers then have to deal with the problems this causes getting bitched at by angry customers and such. On top of that some things if not done properly can create a safety issue. We have safeguards in place for this but again it’s just extra work for someone else to redo it. This attitude is causing far more problems for their coworkers than it is for the business.

              • lightnsfw
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                They’re on track to get fired so they’re not going to get paid for long. You totally ignored what I said about making all their coworkers suffer for their laziness. I thought all us workers were supposed to be in this together?

                  • lightnsfw
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    It’s not. Management gave them an extra 6 month freeze on any corrective action for not meeting their metrics while we gave them dozens of hours of extra training to try and help them get their shit together. A handful of them actually listened and are now doing okay. The rest didn’t give a fuck and are doing as bad as ever.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some of the workers may be managerial. But the managerial workers don’t own a disproportionate amount of the company, and they’re not considered the “superior” of any other workers.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Didn’t say they run it. The person who runs it can be simply another employee. It’s just there are no outside investors and everyone has a vote on the board. You put someone in charge you trust but everyone as a whole has a say in big picture stuff with the person at the top being day to day and being held accountable to employees and not investors.

      Capitalism fundamentally changes the relationship between workers and their work. One takes the value they create and gives it to someone else. One doesn’t.

      • CoLa666@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        But why would this employee put in that more work than anybody else? Just to get the same amount of compensation as anybody else? I certainly wouldn’t put up with all the complications of leading a bunch of people without being paid extra.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          But why would this employee put in that more work than anybody else? Just to get the same amount of compensation as anybody else?

          Who said that’s the case?

          • CoLa666@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Than I don’t really get the idea. Could you elaborate?

            • As far as I understood, the company’s shares belong to the employees (“everyone gets a seat on the board”) and those elect a director which in turn organises the work structure, assigns roles etc. Correct?
            • Can he be replaced at all times?
            • How is the compensation of the employees determined?
            • How are employees handled which are not performing their duties?
            • Can employees be fired?
            • How can employees join and leave the company?
            • Do they return their shares on leaving?
            • Can they buy and sell their shares?
            • How do new employees get their shares? Are they assigned or bought?
            • How is capital raised for large long-term investments like a new machine?
            • If the employees bring up the capital, do they get interest?
            • What if no capital can be raised? Is the company terminated?
            • Can some employees put in more capital than others?
            • Is the financial gain distributed equally between the employees?
      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes I think so, because the people running the company have no interest in listening to the positions of the workers, especially if it makes them less money.

        When the people working in the company have a democratic vote, they at least have a choice and don’t have big mistakes dictated from upon high.

        At least then, the workers can agree they all made a shitty mistake together. It doesn’t mean workers are infallible. All humans are fallible. All humans make mistakes. The difference is the power dynamic, nothing else.

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think they have education related to the running of a large company whereas most of my coworkers barely made it through their IT certs and have some of the stupidest takes regarding how things should be done I’ve ever heard in my life.

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m great to work with. No one has to worry if the task they assign me is going to be done right and on time.

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Every single job I’ve had was made worse by management. Not just worse for us, but worse for customers/clients as well. I have zero faith in management, I have complete faith in the people actually working on the floor knowing what would be best to do on the floor.

      Now you ask about “not making it fail immediately” which to me gives me an impression of thinking it is still a business that needs to be grown.
      I imagine a lot of shop floors would agree their time and resources were better spent elsewhere. No one needs Funko pops, I don’t doubt those workers would find something better to do