This is a follow-up from my previous thread.

The thread discussed the question of why people tend to choose proprietary microblogging platfroms (i.e. Bluesky or Threads) over the free and open source microblogging platform, Mastodon.

The reasons, summarised by @noodlejetski@lemm.ee are:

  1. marketing
  2. not having to pick the instance when registering
  3. people who have experienced Mastodon’s hermetic culture discouraging others from joining
  4. algorithms helping discover people and content to follow
  5. marketing

and I’m saying that as a firm Mastodon user and believer.

Now that we know why people move to proprietary microblogging platforms, we can also produce methods to counter this.

How do we get “normies” to adopt the Fediverse?

  • lightnsfw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    We need fedi to go mainstream to deny corpo trash profits.

    Why? Who cares if we don’t have to interact with them? Becoming mainstream was the downfall of Reddit.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      If you don’t forge your own destiny, then somebody will do it for you aka reddit.

      Reddit failed due to governance and centralization issue. Not BC it was mainstream IMHO

      • lightnsfw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        You don’t think the massive amount of repetitive jokes and reposts and overall shitty attention whoring content was a problem on Reddit?

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I would posit that the main/lame stream is not the actor doing that shit but rather that their presence attracts bad faith actors.