(Content warning, discussions of SA and misogyny, mods I might mention politics a bit but I hope this can be taken outside the context of politics and understood as a discussion of basic human decency)

We all know how awful Reddit was when a user mentioned their gender. Immediate harassment, DMs, etc. It’s probably improved over the years? But still awful.

Until recently, Lemmy was the most progressive and supportive of basic human dignity of communities I had ever followed. I have always known this was a majority male platform, but I have been relatively pleased to see that positive expressions of masculinity have won out.

All of that changed with the recent “bear vs man” debacle. I saw women get shouted down just for expressing their stories of being sexually abused, repeatedly harassed, dogpiled, and brigaded with downvotes. Some of them held their ground, for which I am proud of them, but others I saw driven to delete their entire accounts, presumably not to return.

And I get it. The bear thing is controversial; we can all agree on this. But that should never have resulted in this level of toxicity!

I am hoping by making this post I can kind of bring awareness to this weakness, so that we can learn and grow as a community. We need to hold one another accountable for this, or the gender gap on this site is just going to get worse.

  • MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    30 days ago

    My proverbial beef isn’t the pointing out of how manny men are predators and that the risksfor women are non-zero; my problem more specifically is that the meme stacks handily on top of the already vexing racial profiling I deal with as a black man who’s had false allegations leveled in the past and lost jobs because of the weaponization of this fear. I have already spent damn near a half century being presumed some kind of feral Mandingo rape beast purely for existing while black. The presumption of interest in all of these women like a scene out of Kentucky Fried Movie gets really old and they get super vindictive when rejected.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yeah that’s what I found the most surprising. Even after you understand what women really mean in this thought experiment, it’s just textbook discrimination and no different than targeting certain races as a cop.

      I thought as a society we all agreed that was bad but apparently it’s okay if the victims are men.

      So this thought experiment does reveal sexism, the sexism against men.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        It doesn’t matter how much it upsets you, “hurting your feelings” will always be safer than “being raped and murdered”.

        Maybe it’s time to shake off the insecurity and accept that if you’re not doing anything wrong then you’re not who women are talking about.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          30 days ago

          It’s not about upsetting me, it’s about making a judgment of an individual based on the demographic, which I thought we collectively decided was wrong.

          If someone walks past a group of minorities and feels unsafe, that’s fine as humans are emotional creatures. But if someone makes a decision based on the above logic, that would be classified as discrimination. Same way mostly searching minorities at the airport is discrimination.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            The medical history of abuse of black people in America is largely fueled by the nonsense that ‘black people feel less pain’. It’s incredibly fucked up. Horrible shit was done based on these stereotypes.

            Same logic applies when women abuse men. 'men feel less pain/are stronger. Abuse against men is just the ‘price we should pay for our privilege’ etc. etc.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Of course I’m not. I just think the analogy is just incredibly overstated. Bears are in fact all fairly dangerous. Most men just aren’t

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            How do you know all bears are dangerous? Maybe there’s one that just wants to be friends? You should politely treat all bears as friendly so that you don’t hurt that bears feelings.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      30 days ago

      I feel for you, the casual racism and sexism against black men is pretty crazy. Used to work with a guy that wore a suit every day in a very casual office, because women wouldn’t get on the elevator with him otherwise.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Yep. It’s incredibly fucked up to think how prevalent that 1920s horseshit still is in many people’s minds 100 years later.

      People still seem to think Birth of a Nation is a documentary.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      This was moving to read. It’s a fucked up situation, thank you for sharing.