• koreth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Commander Reid Wiseman and his crewmates—pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen—were named to the Artemis II crew on April 3.

    “Hello, crewmate! What are you doing on this mission?”

    “I’m the pilot. You?”

    “I’m the Canadian.”

  • R4iNO@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see a bunch of people saying we should spend our limited money elsewhere. But these missions cost money similar to our Movies for fuck’s sake. Spending money on these missions (the money goes to people on the earth, making technical stuff, it doesn’t vanish) is better than spending on bread and circus, or even military.

    The money amounts are FUCKING TINY. Stop whining so much about a good thing. We are talking about nations, not a single broke household.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I mean really, if the US can spend 1.8 trillion on pandemic relief, a few billion on space exploration is a drop in a bucket. And we’ll probably get better returns on the investment.

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would love it if they landed on the moon on the anniversary of the original landing. Then I’d share my bday with both anniversaries of the landings.

  • smosjoske@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    News about the moon always gives me a big what-if sense. Like the series “For All Mankind”. It is always with a big regret that I think of what could have been. But excitement about what will be in terms of space exploration. Is there any other explanation besides money and public support for why the moon and space stopped being interesting for governments?

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing on it we can use. That’s the gist of it. If it has resources we could exploit we’d have been making bases up there since day one.

      • Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are so many asteroids with exotic materials that justify throwing nonsensical amounts of money into furthering space exploration and travel. The problem is being unable to take advantage of those resources in our lifetime. Makes us unwilling to try.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes me so happy

    It happened decades before I was born and we haven’t bothered to land on a single celestial option since. It’s ridiculous. I can’t believe no other country even did it since then.

  • masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sooo… the US is, once again, feeling threatened and is planning to send people to the moon to make itself feel better about it - just like last time.

  • RockyBockySocky@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that this is really cool and I love space too, learning about it is great.

    But is this really what we should be spending our limited resources on?

    • Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The endgame is asteroid mining. Getting more efficient at space travel allows us to retain more energy for mining operations.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No the end game is the consumption of all resources until we run out and die. Earth wasn’t enough now we need to fuck up the moon