• empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Just had to one up me huh?

    I love how Bridgeports look almost completely identical regardless of whether they were cast in the 1950’s or the 1990’s/2000’s.

    Fun fact: The machine’s serial number is hard stamped on the flat portion of the knee Y-axis ways, facing straight up. If you turn the y axis most of the way in (push the table towards the turret) the way covers should reveal it. You can then look up the serial number range here to determine when it was cast.

        • Pseu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a good design that forms the basis of a lot of infrastructure in manual shops. Vises and fixtures are designed with the clearance and capabilities of a Bridgeport in mind and some shops will have dozens of different setups. If a replacement machine isn’t identical to the one being replaced, it could cause hours of fixture reworks and a whole mess.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        ours is clean, not nicer maintained. It was plant maintenance’s mill for most of it’s life so ours got used well, there is pleeeeenty of slop in the ways that I wish I could take out.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think almost every shop in the US has a Bridgeport somewhere. This one looks better than most.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    A friend of mine had a movie editing table made out of steel. It was from the 50s or early 60s, and was apparently made out of battleship steel.

    I’ve heard that after WWII there was so much extra steel that making things out of steel was unusually cheap. As a result, a lot of those things have survived because they could afford to overbuild things using cheap steel. I wonder if it is also that machinists who worked during WWII were used to overbuilding things because they had to survive in a war environment.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Heads up, if you just simply blacked it out in paint, saved it, and posted it, the original image is still in the file, and a savvy person can just go in and delete the layer of black.

  • coco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why changing the recipe ?

    If it so goood then why upgrade ? If those 50 machine still work then !

    Ps i used to mill those old various model at school in the 2000

    Mazak Huron Cincinnati Bridegport DoAll cant remember the rest

    • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are school only had off brands, we had domost Huroff Broughport and mayonnaiseak not really we had good machines, but old and sturdy is better than new and weak.

  • ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Neat! At an old job, we had a drill sharpener that was on a battleship in the 40’s. The paint stamp on it that said “war finish” by order of the war production board" was neat AF.