• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I understand they want closure and to prevent this from happening again, but suing a video game publisher bcz of depictions of guns is a bit of a reach.

    There’s research to back this up, video games do not cause violence.

    • BlitzKrieg2552@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They just want closure and for something to blame without actually tackling the real problem, gun control, which will never happen because ‘murica. They’d never get anywhere if they tried.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 month ago

        They voted all the leadership positions for the Uvalde police back in, so voters collectively approved of their actions.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The research is not nearly comprehensive enough to say that a massively popular game franchise does not have a social and political effect on how people view firearms. That’s a massive leap from “gamer kids don’t get into fights at recess more than non-gamers.”

      • Gadg8eer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        I agree purely on a “cultural influence” level, as while I doubt CoD caused a school shooting, it seems the argument these grieving families are making is “CoD glorifies guns and gun culture, therefore this will send a message that gun culture is not acceptable and guns being admired is dangerous.” On that I feel that if they have to destroy an over monetized and creatively bankrupt game franchise to send a message that guns are not toys or fashion accessories, CoD’s continuation will not be missed by the majority of gamers.

        My only concern is that if they do succeed, that means anything can be censored in the US if it promotes cult-like behavior, which is too subjective to be properly defined without giving politicians another way to FUD people and thus does not solve the problem.

        That, and fuck those cops who caused the majority of the issue. At that point, grab kitchen knives, conceal them, go to a local police station, calmly say you want to report a crime, and when the cop comes out to ask, slit his throat and say “this is for the kids you killed”. I would not trust an American cop ever at this point, so if anyone from my own or any other country reads this, I’m not going to kill a cop because the RCMP are actually trustworthy and have ensured everyone’s safety. I’m not intending to incite actual violence, only stating that these families are targeting the wrong people and they’re probably doing it because they were told justice will never come because the fucking police wanted it that way.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sorry, wrong target. Sue the cops who didn’t act. Oh, wait. They’re basically untouchable. Well, I guess sue yourselves for having children in America. That’s about the only case you might win.

  • Crismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 month ago

    I find it sad that some lawyer sold them on this suit, while also settling with the police department for peanuts.

    The police caused all of the extra pain here, and no studies have ever shown a link to violence from video games.

    • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have no doubt that Adam Lanza’s obsession with Dance Dance Revolution compelled him to commit the Sandy Hook massacre.

      That’s how they get you. Before it was Catcher In The Rye, then it was Helter Skelter. Next it’ll be Kirby’s Return to Dream Land Deluxe!

      It’s the tessellation of the splines, I tell you! THE TESSELLATION OF THE SPLINES

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    The fact that CoD doesn’t even use real guns/manufacturers anymore makes me think this suit has zero chance. Video games do not cause violence, certainly not more than any other media!

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, without evidence that Activision/CoD were intentionally in cahoots with arms manufacturers, this is pretty flimsy.

      I do think the case against Daniel Defense is stronger, though. I can see a legitimate argument being made that guns should not be advertised directly at teenagers and young men, and that firearms shouldn’t be advertised on social media in general.

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    「Points to US Army.」

    COD has had creepy right wing ideology sewn into it at least as far back as Ghosts (which also featured – I hear – amazing dog levels) but yes, even recent one had messages more about _are you willing to make the tough choices [and commit atrocities] in the name of national security. That’s pretty right-wing.

    But that doesnt qualify as incitement to action (at least not in US law) because it isn’t specific (e.g. Justice Thomas must be killed before he does any further damage to our civil rights )

    Freedom of speech allows us to paint groups as bad guys in art, and it’s up to our critics and curators to highlight these and other problematic features.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe they should switch gears and try suing them for motivating basement dwelling armchair Action heroes so they became Uvalde Cops. No wonder they thought they could handle a shooter until shit got real.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oy! Before you spew out shit that is frankly disgusting in the context of what happened in Uvalde, maybe think for a split-second about what you’re about to say, eh?

      Besides, if a whole nation continues to fail it’s “tired, poor, it’s huddled masses yearning to breathe free”, blaming parents for just not parenting enough is misguided at best and delusional at worst. Do you think parents just don’t give a fuck when their children suffer? Do you think parents will just let their kids down and let them fall into the void that results in school shooters? No. No, they will not. But there is only so much a parent can do if the entire rest of society doesn’t give the slightest of fucks. You don’t have kids, have you?

      • Dreizehn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In the USA, of course it happens and you wonder why people end up using guns to solve their problems. Immerse yourself into a 1st World EU country and watch how the social programs work to help people, which prevent lunatics from developing. For example, maternity leave, some countries have 3 years for each parent. The USA is fucked up in every single direction and it’s all thanks to greed.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ah yes, because being a good parent and making sure your kid goes to school would’ve certainly prevented them from getting shot at the elementary school 😅🤔.

    • grff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      This right here. Lack of parenting is the issue . And children in school these days , their mental health is ignored and we let kids graduate despite not meeting requirements. No wonder we have such an issue with disrespect, mental health, and intelligence. We are failing a generation and its now starting to catch up