• Ginger666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    No amount of ads are “fair”

    I’m done wasting my life for other people.

    Go ahead tho, you do you boo

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m done wasting my life for other people.

      I do enough of that at work as it is. I’ll be fucked if I do it during my downtime, too.

    • lledrtx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      How do you propose YouTube should pay for infrastructure costs (servers, Internet etc), staff costs (engineers, designers, moderators) and the content creators?

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google Ads on the webpages of all the webpages on the Internet, similar to their status quo.

        I don’t think any of us should be concerned about Google’s cash flow. It’s their job.

        • lledrtx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you saying that the ads shouldn’t be video ads but webpage ads, instead?

          It’s their job.

          Yeah, exactly why they are enforcing anti-adblock rules…

          • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            If this is how Youtube advertised, I wouldn’t block the ads. I refuse to sit through ads when I’m searching through videos and I don’t even know if the video is the one I want to watch. It’s going to take a three minute search into a 10 minute search.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would’ve been fine paying if the price reflected what I was actually paying for (not being advertised to) which would be <$0.005 per viewed video (let’s be generous and call it 1 or 2$/mo) but noo they have to ask for 25$/month like greedy little shits.

        • lledrtx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          That price wouldn’t even begin to cover it. Infrastructure is expensive at that quality. Engineers to maintain such infrastructure are also expensive. Content creators make a ton of money too. Their profits are much lower compared to peers - https://mannhowie.com/youtube-valuation

          Also, 22$/month gets you a family plan for 5 people so wtf are you talking about?

          I don’t give 2 shits about YouTube, I use ad block where I can too. I’m just saying that people who complain about YouTube’s anti-adblock stuff are being unrealistic, you can’t fault them for trying to block people from stealing from them.